Legal Opinion
Fors v. Farrell
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1935No. Docket No. 13, Calendar No. 37,921PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
Plaintiff herein, is the receiver of the American State Savings-Bank of Lansing, a Michigan corporation. The bank suspended doing business in December, 1931, and in a suit brought for that purpose, its. stockholders were decreed to pay an assessment equal to the par value' of their respective holdings. At that time 5,695 shares of its stock of the par value of $20 each stood in the name of Felix M. Farrell. This stock was issued to - bim in September and October, 1929, and he held-it as-agent of, or trustee for, the First National Company of Detroit, now by change of corporate name the Assets…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Concord First National Bank v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Ohio Valley National Bank v. HulittSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Papo v. Aglo Restaurants of San Jose, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re Burger's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Bicknell v. GarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Charles E. Austin, Inc. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Nettles v. RhettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.