Legal Opinion
Frances Sharp Lichtenstein v. Maurice Lichtenstein, and Darby Farms, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 3, 1972No. 19352PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LAYTON, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a final order directing appellant (husband) to pay the corporate defendant (Darby) sums of money determined to be due by an accountant in accordance with a settlement agreement. The husband contends (1) that the accountant exceeded his authority and (2) that even if he acted within his authority, an appeal can be taken from his determinations.
The plaintiff (wife) and her husband were married in December 1962. Thereafter, Darby was incorporated, Mr. and Mrs. Lichtenstein each owning % of the stock and one Streeper Karr, III, a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frances Sharp Lichtenstein v. Maurice Lichtenstein and Darby Farms, Inc., Maurice LichtensteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Kelly v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Melnick v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Lichtenstein v. LichtensteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Bernard v. BausCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Apple Corps Ltd. v. International Collectors SocietyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Hobbs & Company, Inc. v. American Investors Management, Inc. And Harry M. WeenigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Frances Sharp Lichtenstein v. Maurice Lichtenstein, and Darby Farms, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Lichtenstein v. LichtensteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.