Legal Opinion

United States v. Conagra Grocery Products Co.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided March 12, 2014No. Civil No. 2:11-cv-455-NTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; ON THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY; AND ON THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge.

Before the Court are three motions by Plaintiff United States of America (the “Government”): (1) its motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 78), seeking to dismiss certain of Defendant ConAgra Grocery Products Co., LLC’s (“ConAgra”) affirmative defenses; (2) its motion in limine to exclude expert testimony of defense experts Douglas…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCue v. BradstreetDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2014
  2. Power v. Connectweb Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API