Legal Opinion
McCue v. Bradstreet
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 30, 2014No. Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00204-JDLPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JON D. LEVY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the defendant, Seth Bradstreet, III (ECF No 38). After careful review, I conclude that Bradstreet’s motion for summary judgment should be GRANTED.
I. INTRODUCTION
Carl McCue claims that in 2006 and 2007, Bradstreet, then the Maine Commissioner of Agriculture, retaliated against him for constitutionally-protected speech.1 He seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Complaint, ECF No. 1.
McCue is a dairy farmer with a history of allegations…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Borges Ex Rel. SMBW v. Serrano-IsernCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Noviello v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.