Legal Opinion
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Bodman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 1, 2007No. Civil Action 05-1467 (EGS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are plaintiffs’ and defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs bring this action to challenge a crude oil refund award by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (“OHA”) of the Department of Energy (“DOE”) to Lubrizol Corporation (“Lubrizol”) as a beneficiary of the crude oil overcharge restitution program. After the OHA’s initial determination in favor of Lubrizol and award of $557,736, see Administrative Record (“A.R.”) at 227-29 (OHA Decision and Order, August 12, 2004), plaintiffs filed a complaint in this Court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Con Edison Co NY Inc v. Bodman, SamuelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. BodmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Long-Distance Telephone Service Federal Excise Tax Refund LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- SEC v. Patel, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- Rajapakse v. ShawDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- SEC v. Patel, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- SEC v. Patel, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.