Legal Opinion
Olmscheid v. Paterson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 1989No. C5-88-2425, C5-89-104PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment. The trial court ruled that Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway (Railroad) had no duty to reconstruct or *126redesign its trestle to alleviate a visual obstruction at an intersection. The trial court also ruled that Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (Intervenor) could not amend its complaint to assert a negligence claim against the City of Edina (Edina). We affirm.
FACTS
On June 18,1978, appellant Peter J. Olm-scheid was injured when his motorcycle collided with a car driven by James Arthur Paterson. The accident occurred…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leaon v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Swenson v. Emerson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Security Bank of Pine Island v. HolstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Kelsey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Perkins v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Noland v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991