Legal Opinion

Security Bank of Pine Island v. Holst

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 1974No. 43977PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Walter McFarland appeals from an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The court had ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff for conversion of the proceeds of the sale of certain calves. Plaintiff had an unrecorded security interest in the calves of which McFarland had notice. We affirm.

Plaintiff bank loaned defendant Howard Holst money for the purchase of certain calves, taking a chattel mortgage on said calves. That mortgage was not recorded. Defendant McFarland furnished feed for these calves to Holst. Holst arranged the sale of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Urban v. Continental Convention & Show Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Marriage of Crowley v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Empro Corp. v. Scottland Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. McMains v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API