Legal Opinion
Noland v. Soo Line Railroad
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 30, 1991No. C6-91-158PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
The trial court granted summary judgment to respondent Soo Line Railroad Company in a negligence action brought by appellant Sandra Hattenberger Noland, who was injured when she drove her snowmobile off respondent’s railroad trestle, We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant was injured when she drove her snowmobile over the side of a railroad trestle owned by respondent. According to appellant’s affidavit and answers to respondent’s interrogatories, she was snowmobiling with others on a snowmobile trail after dark on December 26, 1987. Appellant claims she had never been on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Hanson v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Watters v. Buckbee, Mears Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, and the Class of Beneficiaries, Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 573.02 v. The City of Stillwater, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Prokop v. Independent School Dist. No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Lishinski v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001