Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided May 10, 1994No. Civ. A. No. 3:92-CV-0170-DPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZWATER, District Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the magistrate judge quashing a trial subpoena duces tecum served on a mediator appointed by a state court. The parties who issued the subpoena contend the mediator’s testimony is necessary to refute plaintiffs claims in the present suit that relate to the settlement of state court lawsuits that the witness mediated. Without approving the magistrate judge’s recognition of a mediator privilege, the court discerns no basis to disturb the order and therefore affirms.

I

Plaintiff Andrew L. Smith (“Andrew”) brings this action against…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Avary v. Bank of America, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  2. Williams v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
  3. Ferko v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
  4. Folb v. Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health PlansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  5. Lahr v. Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API