Legal Opinion

United States v. Lopez

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1960PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGOHEY, District Judge.

An indictment in four counts charges defendant with three substantive violations of the narcotics laws and with conspiracy to violate them. Defendant now moves for discovery and inspection, under rule 16, Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. 18 U.S. C.A. of his unsigned statement and of the narcotics here involved. He moves also under rule 7(f) for a bill of particulars.

The motion to inspect defendant’s statement is denied as outside the scope of rule 16. United States v. Cohen, D.C., 15 F.R.D. 269, 272; United States v. Peltz, D.C., 18 F.R.D. 394; United States v. Kiamie, D.C., 18…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. PeltzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. United States v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. United States v. KiamieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. United States v. GogelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. TannerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
  2. United States v. BentvenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  3. United States v. CiminoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  4. United States v. KelleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  5. United States v. FancherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API