United States v. Gogel
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
By this motion, defendants seek an opportunity to inspect the transcript of an unsigned question and answer statement given by the defendant George Gogel to an agent of the Bureau of Internal Revenue. In an opinion filed earlier today, I denied a similar motion seeking examination of a defendant’s statements in a bribery case. United States v. Louie Gim Hall, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1956, 18 F.R.D. 384. I there held! that the limited discovery provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., do not extend to statements made by defendant to *108go…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. HallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. BentvenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- State v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- United States v. BensonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- United States v. FancherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
- United States v. JannuzzioDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.