Legal Opinion
Bahramian v. Papandrea
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 28, 1981PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
In this mandamus action, the defendant, the personnel director of the city of Meriden, appeals from a judgment ordering him to restore the plaintiff to the position of the city’s planning director and to certify to the city comptroller that the plaintiff is eligible for the planning director’s compensation.
On July 3, 1978, the plaintiff was hired as planning director subject to a twelve-month probationary period. From that date until October 10, 1978, he served as planning director under the direction, control, and supervision of the Meriden planning commission. On October 10, 1978, after the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Kosinski v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Bassett v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Lerner Shops of Connecticut, Inc. v. Town of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sentner v. Board of Trustees of Regional Community CollegesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Beccia v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Civil Service Commission v. PekrulConnecticut Superior Court · 1989
- Golab v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Clark v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.