Golab v. City of New Britain
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the period of time during which police officer Arthur Golab, the plaintiff, had been placed under suspension, prior to being formally dismissed, constituted service for the purpose of determining his eligibility to receive retirement benefits. Golab sought a writ of mandamus compelling the defendants, the city of New Britain (city) and the board of trustees of the policemen’s *18pension fund of New Britain (board), to grant his application for retirement benefits. After a trial to the court, judgment was rendered for the defendants, from which the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Morris v. CostaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Wendt v. WendtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Tuchman v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Shaw v. L.A. Socci, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Par Developers, Ltd. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.