Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Lees

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 30, 2004No. CA 03-317Published

1Opinion of the Court

189 S.W.3d 463 (2004)

87 Ark. App. 172

R.C. ROBERTSON

v.

Raymond LEES.

No. CA 03-317.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions IV, I.

June 30, 2004.

Witt Law Firm, P.C., by: Neva B. Witt, Ozark, for appellant.

Walters, Hamby & Verkamp, Greenwood, for appellees.

SAM BIRD, Judge.

This is a case about a boundary line dispute. The trial court found that appellant, R.C. Robertson, had failed to prove a boundary by agreement or acquiescence or that he proved ownership of the disputed tract by adverse possession. The trial court also quieted title to a parcel of land in appellee, Raymond Lees. We affirm in part…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dodson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Holaday v. FrakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Petrus v. Nature ConservancySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Summers v. DietschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API