Robertson v. Lees
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
189 S.W.3d 463 (2004)
87 Ark. App. 172
R.C. ROBERTSON
v.
Raymond LEES.
No. CA 03-317.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions IV, I.
June 30, 2004.
Witt Law Firm, P.C., by: Neva B. Witt, Ozark, for appellant.
Walters, Hamby & Verkamp, Greenwood, for appellees.
SAM BIRD, Judge.
This is a case about a boundary line dispute. The trial court found that appellant, R.C. Robertson, had failed to prove a boundary by agreement or acquiescence or that he proved ownership of the disputed tract by adverse possession. The trial court also quieted title to a parcel of land in appellee, Raymond Lees. We affirm in part…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Dodson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
- Holaday v. FrakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Petrus v. Nature ConservancySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Summers v. DietschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.