Legal Opinion

Petrus v. Nature Conservancy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 11, 1997No. 97-156PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This case is a sequel to Nature Conservancy v. Kolb, 313 Ark. 110, 853 S.W.2d 864 (1993). In Kolb, this court determined that the Nature Conservancy and Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission’s predecessors-in-title had obtained a 100-foot-wide easement, not a fee simple interest, in a strip of land across the north half of a section of land in Lonoke County, so long as that land was used for railroad purposes. Kolb and others who owned property adjoining the disputed easement filed suit to quiet title, alleging that, when the right-of-way was no longer used for railroad…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Riddick v. StreettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Doe v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Harris v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Bailey v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. Rice v. WhitingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Beverly Enterprises-Arkansas, Inc. v. HillierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Myers v. YinglingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Myers v. YinglingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Looney v. LooneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API