Legal Opinion

Sprayberry v. Dougherty County

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 2, 2001No. S00A1683PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Justice.

Margaret Sprayberry and Velinda Hobbs (Appellants) filed a mandamus action, seeking to compel the Board of Commissioners of Dougherty County (Board) to rescind the rezoning of neighboring property. After conducting an unreported bench trial, the trial court denied mandamus and entered judgment for the Board. Appellants appeal directly from the order of the trial court.

1. Although the Board does not contest Appellants’ right to bring a direct appeal, this Court has the duty to determine its jurisdiction *504over any case brought before it. Fullwood v. Sivley, 271 Ga. 248, 249 (517…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fullwood v. SivleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. O S Advertising Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. RubinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. King v. City of BainbridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Harrell v. Little Pup Development & Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Kirkendall v. DeckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Consolidated Government of Columbus v. BarwickSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Ferguson v. Composite State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. Fulton County v. Congregation of Anshei ChesedSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. SMD, L.L.P. v. City of RoswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Cooper v. Unified GovernmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API