Legal Opinion
King v. City of Bainbridge
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 30, 2000No. S00A0175PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hunstein, Justice.
Appellant Ethel King owns a tract of land in Decatur County, Georgia. A substantial part of the tract is located within the city limits of Bainbridge, Georgia (the City) and is zoned as R-2 two family and multiple family residential. Pursuant to the City’s zoning ordinance, mobile homes with a HUD sticker are not permitted within R-2 zoning districts and a permit must be obtained before any house, including mobile homes, may be erected or placed on real property in the City. On September 2, 1995, King placed a mobile home with a HUD sticker on the portion of her property…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- DeKalb County v. Post Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- O S Advertising Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. RubinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Harrell v. Little Pup Development & Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- O S Advertising Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. RubinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
3Cited by38 opinions
- Consolidated Government of Columbus v. BarwickSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Ferguson v. Composite State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Hamryka v. City of DawsonvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Mid-Georgia Environmental Management Group, L.L.L.P. v. Meriwether CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Grogan v. City of DawsonvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.