Legal Opinion
Consolidated Government of Columbus v. Barwick
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 25, 2001No. S01A0564, S01A0565PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hunstein, Justice.
We granted the applications for discretionary appeal in this alcoholic beverage ordinance case brought by appellant, Consolidated Government of Columbus/City of Columbus, to determine whether the issues presented for review come within the ambit of the discretionary appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-35 and to review the ruling by the superior court that the ordinance is unconstitutional. We conclude that these cases are subject to the discretionary appeal process. In addition, finding no merit to the constitutional rulings, we reverse the superior court.
In 1998 appellee Matt…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Craven v. Lowndes County Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- City of Atlanta v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- King v. City of BainbridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Love v. Whirlpool Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Sprayberry v. Dougherty CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Northwest Social and Civic Club, Inc. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Tree of Life Christian Sch. v. City of Upper Arlington, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Foxy Lady, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Powell v. City of SnellvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Fulton County v. T-Mobile South, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.