Legal Opinion
Harrell v. Little Pup Development & Construction, Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 23, 1998No. S98A0217PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Justice.
The Lowndes County Board of Commissioners (Board) conditionally approved a request to rezone certain property to single-family residential use. One of the conditions placed on the rezoning was “modification of the plans to have an entrance and an exit onto Bemiss-Knights Academy [BKA] Road only.” (T. 144) Despite this condition, the present owner of the property, Little Pup Development and Construction, Inc., (Little Pup) created a temporary entrance from the dead-end of Mayfield Lane. Gregory and Sherry Harrell (the Harrells), who reside on Mayfield Lane, brought this action…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bourn v. HerringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Trend Development Corp. v. Douglas CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- O S Advertising Co. of Georgia, Inc. v. RubinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Raskin v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- King v. City of BainbridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Mid-Georgia Environmental Management Group, L.L.L.P. v. Meriwether CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Schumacher v. City of RoswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Sprayberry v. Dougherty CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- U. S. A. Gas, Inc. v. Whitfield CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.