Swezey v. Home Indemnity Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Elizabeth and Robert J. Swezey, Guardians of Daniel Swezey, instituted this action against the Home Indemnity Company (“Home”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, seeking a judgment declaring that their son Daniel Swezey is entitled to recover “basic loss benefits” covering his sizable and continuing expenses for medical care and rehabilitation under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, 40 Pa.Stat.Ann. § 1009.101 et seq. (“Pennsylvania Act”). The background facts of this case were set forth in this Court’s Memorandum Opinion dated January…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Baker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Varner v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hunt v. Erie Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Kirshbaum v. Government Employees InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Holden v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Tioga County1987