Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Erie Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 9, 1989No. Record No. 870869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stephenson

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether an insurance policy is ambiguous. In deciding this question, we must apply Pennsylvania law.

Linda Jean Hunt’s motion for judgment, as it relates to this appeal, sought a judgment declaring that under the terms of an insurance policy issued by Erie Insurance Exchange (Erie), she “is entitled to coverage for unlimited medical and rehabilitation expenses.” Erie defended on the ground that it had paid Hunt the full amount of the benefits due under the policy, which it alleged was $50,000 for medical and rehabilitative expenses. Following a bench…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Mohn v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Shishko v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Elizabeth Swezey and Robert J. Swezey, Guardians of Daniel Swezey v. The Home Indemnity Company. Appeal of Elizabeth Swezey and Robert J. SwezeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MacDougall v. Hartford Ins. GroupVirginia Circuit Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API