Legal Opinion

Holden v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Tioga County

Decided October 30, 1987No. 100 Civil DivisionPublished

1Opinion of the Court

KEMP, P.J.,

Plaintiffs commenced the instant action against defendant seeking recovery under the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, 40 P.S. §1009.101 et. seq., for certain items of allowable expense as defined under that act arising out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred on June 11, 1981. On July 11, *6211986, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking dismissal of plaintiffs’ claim, on the ground that plaintiffs have no claim for no-fault benefits against defendant. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability alone.

S…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Kuchinic v. McCrorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Husak v. Berkel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Crawford v. Manhattan L. Ins. Co. of NYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Bowman v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API