Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Schmid

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1937No. 29857PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Yeager, District Judge.

In this case, Edith Hudson, plaintiff and appellee, instituted action against Edward A. Schmid and the Iowa-Nebraska Light & Power Company, a corporation, defendants and appellants, to recover damages for slander. Plaintiff *584based her right of recovery on certain statements which she alleged were, on or about the 24th day of April, 1935, made to her and in the presence of others by the appellant Edward A. Schmid, who at the time was engaged in the business of the Iowa-Nebraska Light & Power Company, a corporation, the other appellant.

The statement of the case to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. SheftallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Shaw Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. Des Moines Dress ClubSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Owens v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Callfas v. World Publishing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matheson v. StorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Tennyson v. WerthmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Nelson v. RosenbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hennis v. O'CONNORNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. K CORP. v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API