Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Rosenberg
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1938No. 30364PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.
To an amended petition asking damages for the utter*35anee of alleged slanderous words in the presence of divers persons, a demurrer was sustained, and the petition dismissed.
The plaintiff, in his amended petition, brought action under section 20-839, Comp. St. 1929, and alleged that the defendant, wickedly intending to injure the plaintiff, in the presence and hearing of divers persons, falsely and maliciously did speak, utter, and publish these false, slanderous, and defamatory words of and concerning the plaintiff: “He is not reliable“he is one of the biggest crooks in Dawson county;” “he…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pollard v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Axton Fisher Tobacco Co. v. Evening Post Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Yakavicze v. ValentukeviciousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Wisner v. NicholsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Bigley v. National Fidelity & Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matheson v. StorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- A. J. Treutler v. Meredith CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Cinquanta v. BurdettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Barry v. KirklandNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Hennis v. O'CONNORNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.