Legal Opinion

North Carolina State Bar v. Combs

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1980No. 7910NCSB581PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The defendant attempts to bring forward nine questions for review on appeal.

Rule 10(b)(1) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that:

Any exception which was properly preserved for review by action of counsel during the course of proceedings in the trial tribunal by objection noted or which by rule or law was deemed preserved or taken without any such action, may be set out in the record on appeal and made the basis of an assignment of error.

Absent proper preservation of exceptions, the only questions which may be presented for review in this case are whether the judgment is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hinson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. McKethanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Eaton v. Klopman Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Mayhew Electric Co. v. CarrasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Town of Wake ForestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re Rivera-ArveloDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1993
  3. North Carolina State Bar v. TalfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. RaglandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. North Carolina State Bar v. GravesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API