State v. Ragland
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
By his first Assignment of Error, defendant contends the court erred in allowing the State to impeach defendant’s credibility by the use of prior convictions more than 10 years old where (a) the State failed to give written notice of its intent to use such evidence and (b) the court’s failure to determine that the probative value of such evidence substantially outweighed its prejudicial effect as required by Rule 609, N.C. Rules Evid. Rule 609(a) and (b) reads, in pertinent part:(a) General Rule. For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987