Legal Opinion

Saylock v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided September 30, 1992No. 90-1281PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Chief Judge:

This case presents for review a July 11, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision which denied appellant’s claim for entitlement to service connection for flat feet. Upon consideration of the pleadings and the record on appeal, the Court concludes (1) that appellant failed to submit new and material evidence sufficient to reopen his claim; and (2) that principles of administrative regularity dictate a presumption that appellant received notice of the September 1949 rating action. We affirm.

Appellant’s claim for service connection for his flat feet was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  3. Bosmay v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Link v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
  2. Mason v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  3. Schoolman v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
  4. Orland R. Marsh v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
  5. Virginia S. Crain v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API