Lewis v. Arbuckle Wilderness, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment in this slip and fall case was sustained by the trial court. Plaintiff appealed and the Court of Appeals affirmed. We have previously granted certiorari. Because the trial court’s judgment for the defendant was granted prematurely we reverse and remand without being able to address the merits of defendant’s Motion.
This appeal turns mainly on a review of certain dates of events. Those are as follows: On August 29, 1986 defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment. On September 9th and 11th plaintiff filed her Affidavit in Objection…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knell v. BurnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Glick v. GlickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Chenoweth v. La MasterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Whitney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Zancaner v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001