Whitney v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Mandate to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This is an application for a peremptory writ of mandate, commanding the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to direct the clerk of said court to issue execution on a judgment in favor of the petitioner.
It appears from the petition herein that on the 2d .of November, 1901, the plaintiff, as assignee in the matter of M. A. McKinnon, obtained a judgment against one M. Gallick, as defendant in said action, for the sum of twelve hundred dollars and costs; that no part of said judgment has been paid; that after notice of decision and judgment in said action the defendant, on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Stewart v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Morris v. De CelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Odd Fellows' Sav. Bank v. DeupreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Robson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Knell v. BurnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Badella v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.