Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 2001No. 93,764Published

1Opinion of the Court

39 P.3d 791 (2001)

2001 OK 97

Anne PIERCE, Appellant,

v.

Gene O. PIERCE, Appellee.

No. 93,764.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

November 13, 2001.

As Corrected November 21, 2001.

As Modified November 27, 2001.

Rehearing Denied January 8, 2002.

Arnold D. Fagin, Tracy Cotts Reed, Fagin, Fagin, Nixon & Reed, P.C., Oklahoma City, for Appellant.

R. Scott Adams, Adams & Associates, Oklahoma City, for Appellee.

SUMMERS, J.

¶ 1 Plaintiff Anne Pierce argues that the trial judge should have certified his disqualification because Defendant's counsel and counsel's father each gave $5,000 to the judge's campaign, and counsel…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API