Legal Opinion
Zancaner v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 3, 1963No. Civ. 10619PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
This is an appeal by the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company from an order setting aside a summary judgment.
The action was brought by Albert V. Zancaner to recover damages for injuries suffered when a railroad freight car door fell upon him while he was in the process of opening it. Zancaner sued the delivering carrier, Southern Pacific Company, and Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, the initial carrier of the railroad ear. Each answered the complaint and denied negligence.
Louisville and Nashville thereafter, on February 5, 1962, noticed a motion for summary judgment to be heard…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Moon v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
- Whitney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Knell v. BurnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Ellison v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Freidberg v. FreidbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Exchequer Acceptance Corp. v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Lewis v. Arbuckle Wilderness, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.