Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Roberts Co. v. Breidenbach

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 28, 1936:

Fairchild, J.

The judgment and mandate to be considered is one entered in Read v. Agricultural Ins. Co. 219 Wis. 580, 263 N. W. 632. The mandate reads:

“Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint.”

The mandate is not ambiguous on its face, nor is any confusion as to its scope and meaning imported by an examination of the opinion or record. All questions to be reviewed were brought to this court by appeal from the circuit court. In passing upon the record we found there was no appeal taken from the ruling…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spohn v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. American Wrecking Co. v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Read v. Agricultural Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Falk v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Joachim v. Wisconsin Dental Clinic, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Litzen v. EggertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API