Legal Opinion

Spohn v. National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

The policy in question is a standard policy, and, pursuant to sec. 203.01 of the Statutes, contained the following provision:

“No one shall have power to waive any provision or condition of this policy except such as by the terms of this policy may be the subject of agreement added hereto, nor shall any such provision or condition be held to be waived unless such waiver shall be in writing added hereto; . . . nor shall any privilege or permission affecting the insurance hereunder exist or be claimed by the insured unless granted herein or by rider added hereto.”
“This entire policy shall be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hankins v. Rockford Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Welch v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Manchester v. . Guardian Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Carey v. German American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Keith v. Royal Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Artmar, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jeske v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Lincoln Park Arms Building Corp. ex rel. Schroeder v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  4. Albert v. Home Fire & Marine Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Madgett v. Monroe County Mutual Tornado InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API