Legal Opinion
Minneapolis Harvester Works v. Libby
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 27, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court' for Hennepin county, Young, L, presiding, overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
The complaint in this action is as follows, viz.: “The Minneapolis Harvester Works v. Allen D. Libby.
“The plaintiff in the above entitled action complains and alleges :
“First. That the plaintiff now is a corporation duly formed and organized under the general laws of the state of Minne*328sota, and is doing business as such in the county of Hennepin, in said state.
“Second. That ever since on or about the thirtieth day of April, A. D. 1873, the Minneapolis Harvester Company has been and now is a corporation duly formed and organized under the general laws of the state of Minnesota, and now is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- State v. TorinusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marson v. DeitherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Neff v. LammSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Duluth Club v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898