Legal Opinion

State v. Lawton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1946No. 29938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was instituted by the state of Washington against Fred H. Lawton, doing business as Western Millwork Manufacturing Company, and J. Pincus, to collect unemployment compensation contributions from defendant Fred H. Lawton, and for the foreclosure of a lien, as provided by § 100, chapter 35, p. 129, Laws of 1945 (Rem. Supp. 1945, § 9998-238).

Defendant Lawton defaulted, and only defendant Pincus appeared in the action and answered plaintiffs complaint.

We shall not set out the pleadings, since the facts as found by the court were stipulated and the only question raised is whether or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shelton Hotel Co., Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Unemployment Compensation Department v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bates v. McLeodWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. C. S. Barlow & Sons v. H. & B. Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Finos v. Netherlands American Mortgage BankWashington Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hogue v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. RopeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Swanson v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Territory of Alaska v. Craig Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Myerson v. SakrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API