McQueen v. Kittitas County
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Davidson, J., entered October 27,1920, upon findings in favor of plaintiff, in an action for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The legislature, at its biennial session of 1919, passed an act relating to dogs. Laws of 1919, page 27. Bv the first section of the act, it is made the duty of the county assessor of each county, at the time of listing personal property for taxation, to list all dogs owned or kept within his county, giving the name of the owner or keeper, together with the breed, size, color and sex of each dog, and to assess a license tax of one dollar upon each male dog and spayed female, and two and one-half dollars on each female dog, and to make return of such lists and assessments to the county…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- McGlone v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Randall v. PatchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hearn v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- State v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1938
- Casco Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1951
- Frach v. SchoettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- WASH. ASS'N FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.