Close v. Penney OpCo LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 VICKY CLOSE, CASE NO. 3:24-cv-05756-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL 12 v. ARBITRATION (DKT. NO. 13) 13 PENNEY OPCO LLC et al., 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 I INTRODUCTION 18 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. (Dkt. 19 No. 13.) For the foregoing reasons, the motion is DENIED.1 20 21 1 Although the instant motion is denied, the Court anticipates that the litigation will be stayed pending resolution of a materially identical case that originated in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.