Legal Opinion

Close v. Penney OpCo LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 20, 2025No. 3:24-cv-05756Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 VICKY CLOSE, CASE NO. 3:24-cv-05756-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL 12 v. ARBITRATION (DKT. NO. 13) 13 PENNEY OPCO LLC et al., 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 I INTRODUCTION 18 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. (Dkt. 19 No. 13.) For the foregoing reasons, the motion is DENIED.1 20 21 1 Although the instant motion is denied, the Court anticipates that the litigation will be stayed pending resolution of a materially identical case that originated in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re Firstmerit Bank, N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API