Legal Opinion
Banks v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY AND CTY. OF SF
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 1953No. Civ. 15693PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
The Housing Authority of the City and County of San Francisco, its members, and its executive director, have appealed from a judgment which ordered the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate requiring them “1. To certify forthwith petitioners, Mattie Banks and James Charley, Jr., for admission to any units in any permanent public low rent housing development under respondents’ ownership and control, subject only to the same rules, regulations, and preferences applicable to other applicants, and without regard to race or color; 2. To institute forthwith a policy and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Missouri Ex Rel. Gaines v. CanadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- James Holmes v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Abstract Investment Co. v. HutchinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- DeVita v. Housing Authority of City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Housing Authority v. CordovaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.