Housing Authority v. Cordova
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPatrosso, J.
This case and three companion cases [Civ. A. Nos. 8551, 8552 and 8553] present the same questions, and this opinion is equally applicable to each.
The complaint is in the usual form of an action in unlawful detainer, alleging that defendants are the tenants of a unit in a housing development operated by the plaintiff under a month to month tenancy evidenced by a written agreement providing that it may be terminated by either party upon 10 days’ written notice to the other; and that plaintiff elected to so terminate defendants’ tenancy by giving the requisite notice, but that defendants have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Garner v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Krause v. Peoria Housing AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- MATTER OF PETERS v. New York City Hous. Auth.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Bagley v. Washington Township Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Syrek v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.