Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 14, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2621PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

When the alleged malpractice against a doctor requires expert testimony, can expert witnesses other than medical doctors testify as to the standard of care required of the doctor? That is the issue to be decided here.

Appellant filed a complaint in the superior court alleging that appellees were guilty of medical malpractice. After extensive depositions were taken, appellees moved for summary judgment. Appellant opposed the motion, relying on the affidavits of Professor Ivan M. Lytle, Dean Louis J. Kettel, Dean Gladys E. Sorensen, Diana Sims, a registered nurse, as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Shea v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Schueler v. StrelingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. Riedisser v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Festa v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Bell v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API