Festa v. Greenberg
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, President Judge:
Appellees initiated this action against appellant-physician asserting that the surgery he performed upon appellee-wife was done in a negligent manner and without proper consent. The trial court originally entered a compulsory non-suit in appellant-physician’s favor because appellees failed to introduce expert testimony to support either of their claims. Subsequently, the trial court granted appellees’ motions to remove nonsuit and for a new trial stating that expert testimony is not required to establish a physician’s duty to disclose information in informed consent…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- White v. LeimbachOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Hoffman v. Brandywine HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Pauscher v. Iowa Methodist Medical CenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Sagala v. TavaresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.