Legal Opinion
Carlisle Corp. v. Hayes
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 28, 1986No. Civ. 85-0912-R(IEG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RHOADES, District Judge.
The motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 on the first amended counterclaim brought by defendant Joseph B. Hayes dba Hayes Products (“Hayes”), and the motion for summary judgment on the second and third amended counterclaims, or in the alternative, for separate trials pursuant to Rule 42(b) on the second and third counterclaims, and a stay of discovery, brought by plaintiff Carlisle Corporation (“Carlisle”) came on regularly for hearing on December 16, 1985, before the Honorable John S. Rhoades. Defendant Hayes appeared by and through its counsel of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Barry G. Lew, M.D. v. Kona HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buildex Inc. v. Kason Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Tulifua v. TuiteleHigh Court of American Samoa · 1998
- Tulifua v. TuiteleHigh Court of American Samoa · 1999