Legal Opinion
Boudman v. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 16, 1999No. Civ. 98-174-BPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Judith E. Boudman (“Plaintiff’) was employed by Defendant Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians (“Defendant”) as an Assistant Health Director/Health Planner/Environmental Health Director. She has filed a Complaint asserting that Defendant terminated her because of her race and national origin in violation of the Maine Human Rights Act, Me.Rev.Stat. Ann. tit. 5, §§ 4551-4632 (Count I) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Count II), that her termination constituted a breach of contract (Count III), and that Defendant denied her procedural due process…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Glassman v. Computervision Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Talton v. MayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Dry Creek Lodge, Inc., a Wyoming Corporation v. Arapahoe and Shoshone TribesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Akins v. Penobscot IndianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. Executive Director Maine Human Rights CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Ballesteros v. Bangor Hydro-Electric Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- Marshall v. MarshallDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021