Legal Opinion
Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. Executive Director Maine Human Rights Commission
District Court, D. Maine
Decided February 24, 2004No. CIV. 03-24-B-KPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1
KRAVCHUK, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is an action by the Aroostook Band of Micmacs seeking relief in this federal forum in the hopes of forestalling current and future investigations and complaints against the Band under the Maine Human Rights Act and the Maine Whistle Blower Protection Act. The Executive Director and the Members of the Maine Human Rights Commission, and three former employees of the Band 2 are the defendants. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment (Docket Nos. 36, 40, 41) and on January…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- Aroostook Band of Micmacs v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007