Legal Opinion
Ballesteros v. Bangor Hydro-Electric Co.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 30, 2006No. CV-06-105-B-WPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT II OF COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
On September 11, 2006, Gayle Balleste-ros filed a two-count complaint against Bangor-Hydro Electric Company (Bangor Hydro), claiming that Bangor Hydro violated federal law by improperly denying her severance benefits. Compl. (Docket # 1). The first count claimed a violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), § 502(a)(1)(B), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B); the second count claimed a violation of ERISA § 502(a)(3), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). Id. at 3-4.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Glassman v. Computervision Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Richard H. Hatch, Jr. v. Department for Children, Youth and Their Families (State of Rhode Island), Steven Brown and Mary McKee ProposedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ballesteros v. Bangor Hydro-Electric Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2007
- Curran v. Camden National Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2007
- Gautier-Figueroa v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
- Cámara Morales v. Coco Rico, Inc.Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2007