Legal Opinion
Mangold v. Keip
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided August 5, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order dated April 3, 1997 affirmed, with $10 costs.
*954In this plenary action by a landlord against the three individual guarantors of a closely held corporate tenant’s lease, we affirm Civil Court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing the complaint against the guarantors. The lease renewal executed by landlord and tenant contained a condition not present in the original lease, permitting landlord to terminate the lease without qualification in the event a use violation is placed on the premises. This material change which was made without the consent of the guarantors…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Becker v. FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Shire Realty Corp. v. SchorrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Jones & Brindisi, Inc. v. BreslawNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Central Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PergolisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- 801 South Fulton Avenue Corp. v. RadinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Center 48 Ltd. v. May Dept. StoresNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Arlona Limited Partnership v. 8th of January Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Braspetro Oil Services Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Stamell v. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, LLP (In Re Stamell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- In re 95 Lorimer, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2004