Legal Opinion
In re 95 Lorimer, LLC
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ira B. Harkavy, J.
*501Defendant third-party plaintiff the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ICP) moves for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3211 and 3212, summarily dismissing plaintiff 95 Lorimer, LLC’s (Lorimer) amended complaint and separate causes of action on the ground, inter alia, that the action is time-barred and/or the complaint fails to state a cause of action. Lorimer cross-moves for an order precluding ICP’s examination before trial of plaintiff in this action based upon ICP’s alleged failure to comply with a prior discovery order of this court.
Factual…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Becker v. FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Bier Pension Plan Trust v. Estate of SchneiersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. . BackusNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Fehr Bros. v. ScheinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spizz v. Eluz (In re Ampal-American Israel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016