Reynolds v. Day
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered November 20, 1913, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained by a miner, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
The plaintiff brought this action in the superior court of Spokane county to recover for personal injuries suffered by him, which injuries hé alleges were caused by the negligence of the defendants while he was in their employ as a laborer in their mine in the state of Idaho. The amended complaint sets up an ordinary cause of action, as at common law, against a master for negligent injury to his servant. This is followed by the allegation:
“That there is not any statute or law in the state of Idaho providing for compulsory or industrial insurance and the plaintiff does not receive, under the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Wintersteen v. National Cooperage & Woodenware Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
- Loranger v. NadeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Price v. Atchison, T. & SF Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re Vilas' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1941
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.