Legal Opinion

Salas v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2009No. 30,735PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAES, Justice.

{1} The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether an insurer may deny or limit insurance coverage to a known class-two insured in reliance on an undisclosed consent-to-set-tie exclusionary provision. We conclude that Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company (Defendant) had actual knowledge that Mary Salas (Plaintiff) was a class-two insured who had suffered a compensable injury in an insured motor vehicle and, therefore, had an affirmative duty to disclose to Plaintiff the insurance coverage available to her and its terms and conditions. Because Defendant failed to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Romero v. Dairyland InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Watson Truck & Supply Co., Inc. v. MalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Sarchett v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bhasker v. Kemper Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Safeco InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Sherrill v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Soseeah v. Sentry InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API