Legal Opinion
Rudisill v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1948No. 5701PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
The. question raised in this case is whether Section 8 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix, § 308, providing for the restoration to his former employment of a person discharged from the land or naval service, applies to a person who was deferred from induction because he was engaged in an endeavor essential to the war effort, and who surrendered his position voluntarily in order to be eligible for active duty, and was thereupon inducted into the armed forces. Rudisill, the plaintiff, was an expert railroad telegraph operator…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Boston & M. R. R. v. BentuboCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
- Thompson v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1948
- Boston & Maine R. R. v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jerry C. Trulson v. Trane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Wrigglesworth v. BrumbaughDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
- Lapine v. Town of WellesleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Wriggelsworth v. BrumbaughDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
- Downing v. City of ColumbusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.